<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pacific Plastic Trash Island</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thechicecologist.com/2009/06/pacific-plastic-trash-island/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thechicecologist.com/2009/06/pacific-plastic-trash-island/</link>
	<description>eco chic sustainable green living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:37:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The difference between Biodegradable and Compostable &#124; Swipes Lovin Wipes</title>
		<link>http://www.thechicecologist.com/2009/06/pacific-plastic-trash-island/comment-page-1/#comment-5516</link>
		<dc:creator>The difference between Biodegradable and Compostable &#124; Swipes Lovin Wipes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechicecologist.com/?p=1409#comment-5516</guid>
		<description>[...] Special Thanks to the Chic Ecologist who helped me shed light on the effects of plastic! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Special Thanks to the Chic Ecologist who helped me shed light on the effects of plastic! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaRosa</title>
		<link>http://www.thechicecologist.com/2009/06/pacific-plastic-trash-island/comment-page-1/#comment-5510</link>
		<dc:creator>LaRosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 21:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechicecologist.com/?p=1409#comment-5510</guid>
		<description>WOW, 

I cant beleive the idiocy of the people willing to leave comments here. My favorite is James Dagg &quot;....If there were such a thing we would have some image of it, there is none because it probably does not exsist. It is in fact a theory with very loose research behind it.&quot; 

I wonder how you feel about gravity. Is it real? you cant see it but people keep saying its what keeps you stuck to the ground. I bet your religious, can you see any proof of divinity or do you just blindly follow? The FACT of this matter is that Plastics don&#039;t break down. they are an unnatural creation of man that are having adverse effects on the food chain, causing reproductive problems in HUMANS around the world. the idea that we are infallible in our creations is preposterous. as a species we find a solution to make our lives easyer without researching its effects on the environment we are stuck in. 

I think the biggest problem we have is that critical thinking is a forgotten part of our society as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, </p>
<p>I cant beleive the idiocy of the people willing to leave comments here. My favorite is James Dagg &#8220;&#8230;.If there were such a thing we would have some image of it, there is none because it probably does not exsist. It is in fact a theory with very loose research behind it.&#8221; </p>
<p>I wonder how you feel about gravity. Is it real? you cant see it but people keep saying its what keeps you stuck to the ground. I bet your religious, can you see any proof of divinity or do you just blindly follow? The FACT of this matter is that Plastics don&#8217;t break down. they are an unnatural creation of man that are having adverse effects on the food chain, causing reproductive problems in HUMANS around the world. the idea that we are infallible in our creations is preposterous. as a species we find a solution to make our lives easyer without researching its effects on the environment we are stuck in. </p>
<p>I think the biggest problem we have is that critical thinking is a forgotten part of our society as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Moves to Ban Styrofoam State-Wide</title>
		<link>http://www.thechicecologist.com/2009/06/pacific-plastic-trash-island/comment-page-1/#comment-5425</link>
		<dc:creator>California Moves to Ban Styrofoam State-Wide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechicecologist.com/?p=1409#comment-5425</guid>
		<description>[...] curtail health and life expectancy. The legacy that styrofoam leaves is unmistakable. With the pacific gyre growing daily and the cleanup efforts around the world for non-biodegradable products like styrofoam that wash up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] curtail health and life expectancy. The legacy that styrofoam leaves is unmistakable. With the pacific gyre growing daily and the cleanup efforts around the world for non-biodegradable products like styrofoam that wash up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pacific Plastic Trash Island</title>
		<link>http://www.thechicecologist.com/2009/06/pacific-plastic-trash-island/comment-page-1/#comment-5415</link>
		<dc:creator>Pacific Plastic Trash Island</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 12:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechicecologist.com/?p=1409#comment-5415</guid>
		<description>[...] Not convinced that you should bother with reusable bags? Click here to break the camel&#8217;s back. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not convinced that you should bother with reusable bags? Click here to break the camel&#8217;s back. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.thechicecologist.com/2009/06/pacific-plastic-trash-island/comment-page-1/#comment-5353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechicecologist.com/?p=1409#comment-5353</guid>
		<description>@Jay,

An area can easily be compared to a volume, it is a height x width x depth, no different than a piece of furniture occupies 3 dimensions. I am speaking of a confined area by comparing it to a recognizable feature. If I was to say that it encompasses a volume of xx cubic miles, I doubt all but a slim number of readers would know spatially what that looks like.

This is really a description of the affected area, but to get specific, given the density and average particle size, if you were to strain all the pieces out and lay them flat to create a solid surface, it would easily measure twice the size of the continental US or larger.

There is no &#039;alarmist rhetoric&#039; here, only a practical illustration that is based on scientific research. If everything was described to a scientific specification, in scientific terms no one would understand anything except for the scientists themselves, and we already know what is going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jay,</p>
<p>An area can easily be compared to a volume, it is a height x width x depth, no different than a piece of furniture occupies 3 dimensions. I am speaking of a confined area by comparing it to a recognizable feature. If I was to say that it encompasses a volume of xx cubic miles, I doubt all but a slim number of readers would know spatially what that looks like.</p>
<p>This is really a description of the affected area, but to get specific, given the density and average particle size, if you were to strain all the pieces out and lay them flat to create a solid surface, it would easily measure twice the size of the continental US or larger.</p>
<p>There is no &#8216;alarmist rhetoric&#8217; here, only a practical illustration that is based on scientific research. If everything was described to a scientific specification, in scientific terms no one would understand anything except for the scientists themselves, and we already know what is going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.thechicecologist.com/2009/06/pacific-plastic-trash-island/comment-page-1/#comment-5351</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechicecologist.com/?p=1409#comment-5351</guid>
		<description>Good intentions don&#039;t excuse bad math.

An area cannot be compared to a volume. If we sliced a centimeter at a time from the volume of the floating &quot;island&quot; than you could just as easily say that its area is larger than the Earth itself. It simply does not make sense to say it is twice as large as the US unless you are assuming the US to be significantly less than 15 feet deep.

We can all learn from each other and you have done some respectable research. But when someone offers you a technical correction and you spout out a bunch of alarmist rhetoric, you are just as closed-minded and ignorant as anyone you are castigating. The world&#039;s problems cannot be solved until we learn to listen and value being correct in what we say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good intentions don&#8217;t excuse bad math.</p>
<p>An area cannot be compared to a volume. If we sliced a centimeter at a time from the volume of the floating &#8220;island&#8221; than you could just as easily say that its area is larger than the Earth itself. It simply does not make sense to say it is twice as large as the US unless you are assuming the US to be significantly less than 15 feet deep.</p>
<p>We can all learn from each other and you have done some respectable research. But when someone offers you a technical correction and you spout out a bunch of alarmist rhetoric, you are just as closed-minded and ignorant as anyone you are castigating. The world&#8217;s problems cannot be solved until we learn to listen and value being correct in what we say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jane</title>
		<link>http://www.thechicecologist.com/2009/06/pacific-plastic-trash-island/comment-page-1/#comment-5325</link>
		<dc:creator>jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechicecologist.com/?p=1409#comment-5325</guid>
		<description>wow! all of you that think this is not a prob is wrong this is i big prob and should be dealed think  with!currently i am doing a report on the subject and i agree that this is just as big a prob as the golf of Mexico was all of it is polluting the earth that we depend on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow! all of you that think this is not a prob is wrong this is i big prob and should be dealed think  with!currently i am doing a report on the subject and i agree that this is just as big a prob as the golf of Mexico was all of it is polluting the earth that we depend on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.thechicecologist.com/2009/06/pacific-plastic-trash-island/comment-page-1/#comment-5311</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechicecologist.com/?p=1409#comment-5311</guid>
		<description>@James - Actually, it is not a theory and they do have pictures of it. As Mergarthal points out, it in fact is not an island, but a mass collection of plastic debris and &#039;goop&#039; laying just below the surface, so the pictures look more like a jar of ooze with bits and pieces in it. This &#039;loose&#039; research, if you had read the article, was discovered, verified and studied by NOAA, as well as several high standing scientific and educational institutions not to mention all of the non-profit and environmental groups. It does exist and several expeditions have proven this fact. In addition, the science behind it has lead to the discovery of 2 more &#039;plastic islands&#039;, one in the Atlantic, and one in Asia.

@Mergarthal - You are correct, and scientists do not call it an &#039;island&#039; but they are attempting to put it into words that the world can understand and visualize. While it is not an &#039;island&#039; you can go out and walk on, it is a huge collection of debris laying just below the surface, but that doesn&#039;t fit on most press memos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James &#8211; Actually, it is not a theory and they do have pictures of it. As Mergarthal points out, it in fact is not an island, but a mass collection of plastic debris and &#8216;goop&#8217; laying just below the surface, so the pictures look more like a jar of ooze with bits and pieces in it. This &#8216;loose&#8217; research, if you had read the article, was discovered, verified and studied by NOAA, as well as several high standing scientific and educational institutions not to mention all of the non-profit and environmental groups. It does exist and several expeditions have proven this fact. In addition, the science behind it has lead to the discovery of 2 more &#8216;plastic islands&#8217;, one in the Atlantic, and one in Asia.</p>
<p>@Mergarthal &#8211; You are correct, and scientists do not call it an &#8216;island&#8217; but they are attempting to put it into words that the world can understand and visualize. While it is not an &#8216;island&#8217; you can go out and walk on, it is a huge collection of debris laying just below the surface, but that doesn&#8217;t fit on most press memos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

